As continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) gain in popularity, the payment options are growing as well. CCRCs offer a spectrum of care, from independent housing to assisted living to round-the-clock nursing services, all on one campus. According to an article in the New York Times, the new payment options mean selecting a CCRC has become more complicated.
CCRC residents must pay a large entrance fee plus a monthly fee, but the amount of each fee and what it covers can vary, depending on the contract. There are three basic CCRC contracts: life contracts, which cover unlimited long-term nursing care at little or no increase in the monthly fee; modified contracts, which include a specified duration of long-term nursing care, beyond which fees rise as care increases; and fee-for-service contracts, in which residents pay a reduced monthly fee but pay full daily rates for long-term nursing care.
br>
Communities typically offer several variations on each contract. Some CCRCs give residents the option of paying a higher entry fee, which remains refundable. Part of the entry fee will be refunded either to the resident when the resident moves or to the resident's estate once the resident dies. At some other CCRCs, entrance fees are refundable for a period of time, and then become nonrefundable. Still other communities may require residents to purchase their residences. What the monthly fee covers can also vary. Some places include housekeeping and meals, and others don't.
All these choices mean that CCRC contracts have become much more confusing. There is help available. At www.ccrcdata.org you can find a directory of CCRCs and sort them by location, price, long-term health coverage, and refund plans. In addition, once you have selected a CCRC, you should have a lawyer review the contract before signing it. Deciding on a CCRC is a once-in-a-lifetime choice, and it is a decision that should be made carefully.
For more information on CCRCs, click here.
To read the New York Times article reprinted in the International Herald Tribune, click here.
Latest Articles
Will Invalid Due to Undue Influence of Testator's Son
The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed a chancery court's ruling invalidating a decedent's will due to lack of authentication, lack of testamentary capacity, and undue influence and setting aside several deeds. In re the Matter of the Estate of Autry, No.
A roundup of elder law news and practice development articles culled from news sources across the nation during the week of April 22, 2025, to April 28, 2025.
Subscribe to the Knowledge Bank. Get new article and cases summaries
You have been successfully subscribed to the knowledge bank.
We're sorry, you do not qualify for the 30-day trial because you indicated that you are not an attorney or work for a law firm. If this is an error please call us at (866) 267-0947.
If you would like more information on elder law and long-term care planning go to ElderLawAnswers.com.
Experience a demo.
Schedule your 20-minute membership demo. Find out how we can help you connect with new clients.
We're sorry, you do not qualify for the 30-day demo because you indicated that you are not an attorney or work for a law firm. If this is an error please call us at (866) 267-0947.
If you would like more information on elder law and long-term care planning go to ElderLawAnswers.com.
Experience a demo.
Schedule a 20 minute membership demo. Find out how we can help you connect with new clients.