Special Needs Trust Allows Conservator Reimbursement

Special Needs Answers case summary.The California Court of Appeals holds that a conservator may be reimbursed from a third-party special needs trust for expenses made for the ward’s benefit. In Wiedner v. Stevenson (Cal. Ct. App. No. B323760, May 13, 2024).

Roberta Davis created a special needs trust (SNT) for her son, Daniel Black, who had severe disabilities. Her sister, Charlyne Stevenson, was the successor trustee, assuming the role after Ms. Davis’ death. She was also the remainder beneficiary.

The trust excluded another sister, Patty Wiedner. She visited and spent money on Mr. Black before and after becoming his guardian. After Ms. Stevenson denied her repayment from the trust, she initiated an action for reimbursement. The court put equitable liens on the trust for reimbursement for Ms. Wiedner’s conservatorship and attorney fees. Ms. Stevenson appealed.

As Mr. Black’s conservator, Mrs. Wiedner has standing. Under California law, a conservator can seek reimbursement for reasonable expenses.

Since the trust is a third-party special needs trust, it is not part of Mr. Black’s estate. However, the trust terms allow for reimbursement for expenses that improved his quality of life.

While Ms. Stevenson had sole discretion to approve reimbursements, she was required to act in good faith following fiduciary principles. She did not perform this duty as she failed to consult the beneficiary’s conservator about his needs. With lack of contact, she could not know what expenses were necessary.

The trial court did not err when it ordered Mrs. Wiedner to be reimbursed for conservatorship fees and certain out-of-pocket expenditures she incurred for Mr. Black’s benefit, such as dental fees. However, the appellate court denies some of her reimbursement requests because the trust’s terms did not justify them.

Before she became the conservator of her nephew, Mrs. Wiedner and her husband traveled by car to visit Mr. Black. They took him out to eat and to activities like the movies. Since at the time she acted only as a concerned family member and not as a conservator, she cannot recoup these expenses. When creating the trust, Mr. Black’s mother did not intend for her sister to use the funds to pay for outings.

Yet when Mrs. Wiedner became the conservator, the trust terms allowed reimbursement for the necessary expenses she incurred. Performing her duties as the conservator was essential for his welfare.

The trust can only pay her attorney fees when they are part of her conservator duties. When she sought funds for Mr. Black’s dental work, this was part of her duties. Her other legal actions that did not benefit Mr. Black cannot be reimbursed, such as her efforts to seek personal refunds.

She also sought repayment for cash deposits to Mr. Black’s account at the facility where he resided. But Mrs. Wiedner received his Social Security payments, so these cash deposits represented Mr. Black’s money, not hers.

Mrs. Wiedner can obtain reimbursement for certain expenses related to Mr. Black’s well-being, which the trust terms permit.

Read the full opinion.